In-situ Treatment vs Filtration Techniques:
Comparison of Main Arsenic Removal Technologies
Technology
Advantage
Disadvantage
Oxidation and sedimentation: air oxidation, chemical oxidation
Relatively simple, low cost, but slow process (air)

Relatively simple and rapid process (chemical)

Oxidizes other impurities and kills microbes        
Processes remove only some of the arsenic
Used as pretreatment for other processes
Coagulation and filtration: alum coagulation, iron coagulation
Relatively low capital cost

Relatively simple in operation

Common chemicals available        
Not ideal for anion-rich water treatment (e.g. containing phosphates)

Produces toxic sludge

Low removal of As(III)

Preoxidation is required

Efficiencies may be inadequate to meet strict standards
Sorption techniques: activated alumina, iron-coated sand, ion exchange resin, other sorbents        
Relatively well known and commercially available

Well-defined technique

Many possibilities and scope for development
Not ideal for anion-rich water treatment (e.g. containing phosphates)

Produces arsenic-rich liquid and solid wastes

Replacement/regeneration is required

High-tech operation and maintenance

Relatively high cost
Membrane techniques: nanofiltration, reverse osmosis
Well-defined and high removal efficiency

No toxic solid wastes produced

Capable of removal of other contaminants        
High capital and running costs

High-tech operation and maintenance

Arsenic-rich rejected water is produced

Source: World Bank Technical Report, Volumn II: Arsenic Contamination of ground water in South and East Asian countries

In-situ treatment Vs Filtration Techniques
In-situ Technique
Point of Difference
Filter techniques
After treating water for 45 days, As & Fe content went well below WHO guidelines. Fe content in the water is a boon to this technique.
Efficiency
The filters get clogged up with iron and needs frequent  recharging/re-activation. Often these filter beds are expensive.
With minimum maintenance, it can run for 10 years. But within that time, huge amount of arsenic will be trapped within the soil particles. Periodic oxidation will keep them trapped for decades.
Longivity
They require frequent sludge removal & recharge every 4-5 month.
1 to 2 months after starting of the plant.
Start-up time
Instant startup.
$ 5 per month for 3000lt/day plant
Maintenance Cost
               

100$ for 4 months limited use.
Village plumbers & electricians can maintain it.
Expertise to maintain
Specially trained technicians & particular chemicals are required for maintenance.
Any person with basic training.
Operation
A caretaker may be needed.
Highly sustainable process. Source treatment.
Sustainability
No sustainability issue. Point Treatment.
The aquifer is being restored to its previous arsenic free condition.
Natural resource restoration
Only the pumped up ground water is treated.
Minimum iron-arsenic precipitate generation for 3 months. After that, waste generation is nil.        
Waste generation
A cosiderable quantity of iron & arsenic sludge is produced every day. The waste management becomes a problem.
Site owned by:  Bhaskar Sengupta, SPACE, QUB